L A N C E   P H I L L I P S
________________________________________________

INTERROGATORY ESSAY ON SPACE II

 

 

4-11-05

--One thinks the motion thru SPACE into SPECTACLE?
          --Motion itself generates SPACE?
                   --Prime Mover?

--So the notion “God”=that fundamental separation, that fundamental SPACE?

--The names are assumptions of a WHOLENESS which doesn't exist, which lays down what?
                   --Myth

--Can WHOLENESS be Motion contained within SPACE?

5-2-05

--if TIME and SPACE occur as a result of MOTION is it PLACE which occurs via memory?
          --is PLACE stasis?
                   --Can PLACE change via a context
                   --no, in this way it resembles TRUTH i.e. monolithic and steadfast
(over against HONESTY which being modular requires community)

--Can a notion of PLACE expand or contract

--Is the singularity FROM WHENCE a PLACE

--Is my divine notion a mythic PLACE

--Is a person a PLACE
          --without infinitesimal vision

5-8-05

--Can description be anything other than INFORMATION

--What is the DISTANCE separating DESCRIPTION and that described
          --Does it require SPACE
                   --PLACE
--Again back to IMAGE vs. DESCRIPTION

--Does one traverse this SPACE, if it exists:
         1) upon the ACT of describing
         2) upon the ACT of recognition
         3) upon the ACT of understanding

--Does INFORMATION require a locomotion between termini
          --SPACE requires DISTANCE
                   --but does it require a system of traversing that DISTANCE

--Is immersion an attempt to reenact Singularity

 

5-16-05

--Is TOTALITY TIME
          --but TIME is a function of SPACE

--Is TOTALITY SPACE
          --Is TOTALITY a context broad enough to span the situative

--Is TOTALITY personal
          --mythology

 

5-23-05

--Can development occur in the text
          --this is building a STRUCTURE of REASONS or FACTS which is able to be mimicked
                   --How would DEVELOPEMENT jibe with SPACE
                             --under the auspices of the creator/creature binary?

--DESCRIPTION requires SPACE??
          --is any method of DEVELOPEMENT descriptive
                   --Can one describe thought
                             --thinking

--Is a jarring, honest, syntax an organic fracture

--The idea of SPACE is recognized via a series of neural switches
          --physically, yes
--SPACE is the entirety, though that isn't INFORMATION
         --is it?

--so LIFE is the points at which TIME subsumes SPACE and DEATH is the opposite

--What does it mean to say one is DEVELOPING a text
          --that one is occupied
                   --engaging TIME
                             --What is the effect of this on one's Body

 

5-25-05

--Is the BODY an ATTRIBUTE of the TEXT
          --is it an accoutrement
                   --What's the difference

--BODY occurs while it happens
          --as does the TEXT(?)

--If the BODY is an ATTRIBUTE how is it articulated
          --DESCRIPTION???
                   --no, that would be DRAMA

 

6-20-05

--How does SPACE transform the BODY
          --that is the body via its CONTEXT
                   --including transformation

--do the Nymphs hold within them a part of their own TRANSFORMATION that isn't simply FEAR
          --Do they partake of the gods' intervention
                   --that is do they BELIEVE
--In that case SPACE confers likeness or KIND onto the nymph's body?

                                                  --i.e. local flora and fauna

--How does SPACE transform SYNTAX

 

6-21-05

--the syntactical unit called thinking
          --what is syntax's effect on TIME
                   --on SPACE

--is a transformation of syntax a transformation of the BODY or of TIME or of SPACE?

 

7-10-05

--One is transfixed by the gaze of Medusa
                   --for a stone the sense of SPACE is non-sense because its ownmost integrity is its extent of SPACE

--Medusa is of the OLD monsters, i.e. of the Goddess

--What are the differences between being over to SPACE, that is encompassing it with integrity, and withdrawing from SPACE
          --the part of SPACE which is SELF-CONTAINED is not only due to IMMOBILITY but also to lack of CONFLICT
                   --can SPACE be SELF-CONTAINED discretely

--The notion of SPACE is something against something else
--The notion of FRICTION is simply ELSE

--Can one become SELF-CONTAINED
          --is this the method of TRANSFORMATION employed throughout Ovid
         --/the Greek world
                   --the BODY TRANSFORMS by exception thru the process of the consolidation of SPACE?
                             --is this SINGULARITY in reverse

--Is lack of consciousness sufficient grounds for SELF-CONTAINMENT
          --a stone vs. a stone in the shape of a Person

          --one assumes the position of complimenting a human aspect (i.e. stone)
          --one suffers speculation (i.e. shape)

 

 

 

back to issue two

 

[ page 1 of 1 ]